... | ... | @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ If legacy collections are migrated into the GFS, there are three different outco |
|
|
|
|
|
- if the migrated filenames can be renamed using the relevant toolkit script, all the scripts will be able to process them
|
|
|
|
|
|
The advantages and disadvantages of using the GFS file-naming convention for migrated files are indicated in the [The Generic Folder Structure (GFS)](https://itsagit.lse.ac.uk/hub/lse_digitaltoolkit/-/wikis/LSE-Digital-Toolkit#the-generic-folder-structure-gfs) section.
|
|
|
The advantages and disadvantages of using the GFS file-naming convention for migrated files are indicated in the [The Generic Folder Structure (GFS)](https://itsagit.lse.ac.uk/hub/lse_digital_toolkit/-/wikis/LSE-Digital-Toolkit#the-generic-folder-structure-gfs) section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the toolkit is used to manage large digitisation projects with a digitisation company performing the digitisation, it is advisable to include certain items in the contract. These items are detailed in the [Managing your relationship with your Digitisation Provider](https://itsagit.lse.ac.uk/hub/lse_digital_toolkit/-/wikis/LSE-Digital-Toolkit#managing-your-relationship-with-your-digitisation-provider) section.
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |